000 02255cam a2200349 4500
001 63379
003 SAIACS
005 20240313201816.0
008 700414s1969 nyu b 001 0 engm
010 _a69019995 //r853
020 _a0390675008
040 _aDLC
_beng
_erda
_cDLC
_dm.c.
_dDNU
041 1 _aeng
_alat
082 _aARCH YNDC 153.4 O16P
090 _aB765.O33
_bT73 1969
090 _aB765.O33
_bT73
100 0 _aWilliam,
_cof Ockham,
_dapproximately 1285-approximately 1349
_913482
240 1 0 _aTractatus de praedestinatione et de praescientia Dei et de futuris contingentibus.
_lEnglish
245 1 0 _aPredestination, God's foreknowledge, and future contingents. /
_cTranslated with an introd., notes, and appendices by Marilyn McCord Adams [and] Norman Kretzmann
260 _aNew York :
_bAppleton - century- crofts
_cc 1969
300 _aix, 136 pages ;
_c21 cm
490 1 _aCentury philosophy sourcebooks
500 _aTranslation of Tractatus de praedestinatione et de praescientia Die et de futuris contigentibus
504 _aBibliography: pages 115-128
505 0 _aAre passive predestination and passive foreknowledge real relations in the person who is predestinate and foreknown? -- In respect of all future contingents does God have determinate, certain, infallible, immutable, necessary cognition of one part of a contradiction? -- How can the contingency of the will, both created and uncreated, be preserved in the case of its causing something external? That is, can the will, as naturally prior to the caused act, cause the opposite act at the same instant at which it causes that act, or can it at another, subsequent instant cause the opposite act or cease from that caused act? -- Is there a cause of predestination in the predestinate and a cause of reprobation in the reprobate? -- In view of the fact that the propositions 'Peter is predestinate' and 'Peter is reprobate' are opposites, why cannot the one succeed the other in truth?
650 0 _aPredestination
_vEarly works to 1800
_918906
650 0 _aLogic
_vEarly works to 1800
_918907
700 1 _aAdams, Marilyn McCord
_912649
700 1 _aKretzmann, Norman
_916084
830 0 _aCentury philosophy sourcebooks
_918908
942 _2ddc
_cARCH
999 _c92923
_d92923