000 | 02549cam a22003974a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 51476956 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240305113650.0 | ||
008 | 030110s2004 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2003042040 | ||
015 |
_aGBA372630 _2bnb |
||
015 |
_aGBA3V9988 _2bnb |
||
020 |
_a0195165993 _q(alk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a9780195165999 _q(alk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a0195166000 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a9780195166002 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper) |
||
035 |
_a(OCoLC)51476956 _z(OCoLC)52696666 _z(OCoLC)223495206 _z(OCoLC)416173505 _z(OCoLC)936059221 |
||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dYDX _dUKM _dCVN _dBAKER _dBTCTA _dYDXCP _dOCLCG _dSTF _dOCLCQ _dBTN _dGEBAY _dOCLCQ _dIG# _dBDX _dIAD _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dKOL _dOCLCQ _dWLF _dDHA _dOCLCQ _dIL4J6 _dOCLCO _dNKM _dELBRO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCL |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBT103 _b.C73 2004 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_aARCH YNDC 212.1 C886G _221 |
086 | 0 | _aBT103 .C73 2004 | |
100 | 1 |
_aCraig, William Lane _91848 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aGod? : _ba debate between a Christian and an atheist / _cWilliam Lane Craig, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong |
260 |
_aOxford ; _aNew York : _bOxford University Press, _c2004 |
||
300 |
_axii, 156 pages ; _c22 cm |
||
490 | 1 | _aPoint/counterpoint series | |
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index | ||
505 | 0 | _aFive reasons God exists / William Lane Craig -- There is no good reason to believe in God / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong -- Reason enough / William Lane Craig -- Some reasons to believe that there is no God / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong -- Theism undefeated / William Lane Craig -- Atheism undaunted / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong | |
520 | 1 | _a"In God?, William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong bring to the printed page two debates they held before live audiences, preserving all the wit, clarity, and immediacy of their public exchanges. With none of the opaque discourse of academic logicians and divinity-school theologians, the authors make claims and comebacks that cut with precision. Their arguments are sharp and humorous, as each philosopher strikes quickly to the heart of his opponent's case. For example, Craig claims that we must believe in God to explain objective moral values, such as why rape is wrong. Sinnott-Armstrong responds that what makes rape wrong is the harm to victims of rape, so rape is immoral even if there is no God."--Jacket | |
650 | 0 |
_aGod _xProof _97841 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aAtheism _9339 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSinnott-Armstrong, Walter, _d1955- _912645 |
|
830 | 0 |
_aPoint/counterpoint series (Oxford, England) _917917 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cARCH |
||
999 |
_c92156 _d92156 |