000 | 03522cam a22004214i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 58975748 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240203135210.0 | ||
008 | 050407s2006 mau b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a2005009843 | ||
015 |
_aGBA538463 _2bnb |
||
020 |
_a1405101784 _q(hardcover ; _qalk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a1405101792 _q(pbk. ; _qalk. paper) |
||
020 | _a9781405101783 | ||
020 | _a9781405101790 | ||
024 | 3 | _a9781405101790 | |
024 | 3 | _a9781405101783 | |
035 |
_a(OCoLC)58975748 _z(OCoLC)1039586863 _z(OCoLC)1079940547 |
||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dYDXCP _dBAKER _dUKM _dOBE _dCOO _dYUS _dIG# _dLVB _dBTCTA _dNOR _dHNW _dDEBBG _dOCLCQ _dOCL _dOCLCQ _dTULIB _dOCLCF _dP4I _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dDEBSZ _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dERL _dDHA _dOCLCQ _dUKMGB _dEUQ _dOCLCQ _dKFH _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dEUX _dOCLCQ _dU@M _dOCLCO _dIL4J6 _dOCLCO _dOKS _dOCLCO _dGRG _dOCLCO |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBJ1012 _b.C6572 2006 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_aARCH YNDC 171 D771C _222 |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aContemporary debates in moral theory / _cedited by James Dreier |
260 |
_aUSA : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cc 2006 |
||
300 |
_axxiv, 331 pages ; _c26 cm |
||
490 | 1 |
_aContemporary debates in philosophy ; _v6 |
|
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tNotes on contributors -- _tIntroduction / _rJames Dreier -- _gpt. 1. _tNormative theory -- _tIs the rightness of action determined by the value of consequences? -- _g1. _tThe consequentialist perspective / _rWilliam Shaw -- _g2. _tAgainst maximizing act consequentialism / _rPeter Vallentyne -- _g3. _tReasons without demands : rethinking rightness / _rAlastair Norcross -- _tCan contract theory ground morality? -- _g4. _tMoral contractarianism as a foundation for interpersonal morality / _rSamuel Freeman -- _g5. _tCan contract theory ground morality? / _rPhilip Pettit -- _tAre the virtues the proper starting point for ethical theory? -- _g6. _tAre virtues the proper starting point for morality? / _rRosalind Hursthouse -- _g7. _tVirtue theory / _rJulia Driver -- _gpt. 2. _tReason and motivation -- _tAre moral requirements derived from reason? -- _g8. _tReason, sentiment, and categorical imperatives / _rSamuel J. Kerstein -- _g9. _tMust we weep for sentimentalism? / _rSimon Blackburn -- _tIs motivation internal to moral judgment? -- _g10. _tHow do moral judgments motivate? / _rSigrún Svavarsdóttir -- _g11. _tMoral motivation / _rR. Jay Wallace |
505 | 0 | 0 |
_gpt. 3. _tMoral facts and explanations -- _tis morality fully factual? -- _g12. _tMoral factualism / _rPeter Railton -- _g13. _tMorality without moral facts / _rTerry Horgan _gand _rMark Timmons -- _tDo moral facts and properties explain anything? -- _g14. _tMoral explanations defended / _rNicholas L. Sturgeon -- _g15. _tMoral epistemology and the because constraint / _rNick Zangwill -- _tAre there general moral principles? -- _g16. _tEthical generality and moral judgment / _rRobert Audi -- _g17. _tDefending moral particularism / _rMark Norris Lance _gand _rMargaret Olivia Little -- _tIndex of subjects -- _tIndex of names |
520 | _aThis text brings together fresh debates on the most controversial issues in moral theory. Each question is treated by a pair of opposing essays written by eminent scholars | ||
650 | 0 |
_aEthics _9133 |
|
650 | 2 |
_aEthics _9133 |
|
655 | 7 |
_aAufsatzsammlung. _2swd _93680 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDreier, James Lawrence, _eeditor. _4edt _914085 |
|
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iOnline version: _tContemporary debates in moral theory. _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Pub., 2006 _w(OCoLC)645872548 |
830 | 0 |
_aContemporary debates in philosophy ; _v6 _912561 |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cARCH |
||
999 |
_c89579 _d89579 |