000			02110cam a2200325 i 4500
001			26159
003			OCoLC
005			20250624155308.0
008			690916s1969 pau b 000 0 eng
010			_a71081526
020			_a0800601807 _q(paperback)
020			_a9780800601805 _q(paperback)
035			_a(OCoLC)00026159 _z(OCoLC)976753026
040			_aDLC _beng _cDLC _dBAKER _dBTCTA _dLVB _dMOF _dBDX _dEUM _dCFT _dOCLCA _dGDC _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dOCLCA _dCFT _dOCLCF _dOCLCQ _dRCT _dNZABT _dOCLCQ _dCSJ _dDHA _dOCLCQ _dTYC _dBETBC _dOCLCQ _dFQG _dSJG _dOCLCA _dOCLCQ _dIL4J6 _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dOCLCQ
050	0	0	_aBS2555.2 _b.M26 1969
060		4	_aBS2555.2 _b.M26
082	0	0	_a226/.06/1
100	1		_aMcKnight, Edgar V _927562
245	1	0	_aWhat is form criticism? /
260			_aPhiladelphia : _bFortress Press, _c©1969
300			_ax, 86 pages ; _c22 cm
490	1		_aGuides to biblical scholarship
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 80-86)
505	0		_aThe origins of form criticism -- The discipline applied by Dibelius and Bultmann -- Early scholarly evaluation and use of form criticism -- Form criticism and the current quest for the historical Jesus
520			_aThe purpose of form criticism is to determine which of the words or deeds attributed to Jesus go back to Jesus himself and which are likely to be the product of the early Church. The author begins his analysis of form criticism with a brief historical survey of the development of critical New Testament scholarship from the eighteenth century. He then describes the pioneer efforts of Martin Dibelius and Rudolf Bultmann in applying form criticism to the Synoptic Gospels. He believes that the form critical work of some contemporary scholars has greatly enriched our understanding of the Parables, and has added much to our knowledge about the historical Jesus
630	0	0	_aBible. _pGospels _xCriticism, Form _95782
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _aMcKnight, Edgar V. _tWhat is form criticism? _dPhiladelphia, Fortress Press [1969] _w(OCoLC)609006754
830		0	_aGuides to biblical scholarship _927557
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c63478 _d63478