Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Descartes's dualism / Marleen Rozemond

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1998Description: xviii, 279 pages ; 24 cmISBN:
  • 0674198409
  • 9780674198401
  • 0674009681
  • 9780674009684
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • ARCH YNDC 128.2 R893D  21
LOC classification:
  • B1878.M55 R68 1998
Contents:
1. The Real Distinction Argument -- 2. Scholasticism, Mechanism, and the Incorporeity of the Mind -- 3. Sensible Qualities -- 4. Real Qualities and Substantial Forms -- 5. Hylomorphism and the Unity of the Human Being -- 6. Sensation and the Union of Mind and Body
Summary: Marleen Rozemond explicates Descartes's aim to provide a metaphysics that would accommodate mechanistic science and supplant scholasticism. Her approach includes discussion of central differences from and similarities with the scholastics and how these discriminations affected Descartes's defense of the incorporeity of the mind and the mechanistic conception of body. Confronting the question of how, in his view, mind and body are united, she examines his defense of this union on the basis of sensation. In the course of her argument, she focuses on a few of the scholastics to whom Descartes referred in his own writings: Thomas Aquinas, Francisco Suarez, Eustachius of St. Paul, and the Jesuits of Coimbra
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Archives Archives SAIACS Archives Room Yandell Collection ARCH YNDC 128.2 R893D (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 063869

Includes bibliographical references (pages 265-273) and index

1. The Real Distinction Argument -- 2. Scholasticism, Mechanism, and the Incorporeity of the Mind -- 3. Sensible Qualities -- 4. Real Qualities and Substantial Forms -- 5. Hylomorphism and the Unity of the Human Being -- 6. Sensation and the Union of Mind and Body

Marleen Rozemond explicates Descartes's aim to provide a metaphysics that would accommodate mechanistic science and supplant scholasticism. Her approach includes discussion of central differences from and similarities with the scholastics and how these discriminations affected Descartes's defense of the incorporeity of the mind and the mechanistic conception of body. Confronting the question of how, in his view, mind and body are united, she examines his defense of this union on the basis of sensation. In the course of her argument, she focuses on a few of the scholastics to whom Descartes referred in his own writings: Thomas Aquinas, Francisco Suarez, Eustachius of St. Paul, and the Jesuits of Coimbra

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.