Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Contemporary debates in cognitive science / edited by Robert J. Stainton

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Contemporary debates in philosophy ; 7Publication details: Malden, MA ; Oxford : Blackwell Pub., 2006Description: xiv, 339 p. : ill. ; 26 cmISBN:
  • 1405113049 (hbk. : alk. paper)
  • 1405113057 (pbk. : alk. paper)
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • ARCH YNDC 153 S782C  22
LOC classification:
  • BF311 .C659 2006
Contents:
Just how modular is the mind? -- How much knowledge of language is innate? -- Has cognitive science shown that human beings are cognitively bounded, or irrational? -- Are rules and representations necessary to explain systematicity? -- Can consciousness and qualia be reduced? -- Does cognitive science need external content at all? -- Is the aim of perception to provide accurate representations? -- Can mental states, knowledge in particular, be divided into a narrow component and a broad component?
Reviews from LibraryThing.com:
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Item type Current library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Archives Archives SAIACS Archives Room Yandell Collection ARCH YNDC 153 S782C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not for loan 061411

Includes bibliographical references and index

Just how modular is the mind? -- How much knowledge of language is innate? -- Has cognitive science shown that human beings are cognitively bounded, or irrational? -- Are rules and representations necessary to explain systematicity? -- Can consciousness and qualia be reduced? -- Does cognitive science need external content at all? -- Is the aim of perception to provide accurate representations? -- Can mental states, knowledge in particular, be divided into a narrow component and a broad component?

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.